Despite the conceptual prominence of perceived risk, however, several meta-analyses have observed that risk perception only modestly predicts intentions and health behavior in both correlational and experimental tests. Risk perceptions refer to people’s beliefs and feelings about the possibility of disease or other harms to health, and are accorded a central role in many health behavior theories According to these theories, perceived risk is a key predictor of both motivation to take protective action, and subsequent performance of health behaviors geared at alleviating the threat. The TRIRISK model of risk perception and protection motivation
The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Ĭompeting interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.ĭata Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its supporting information files.įunding: This work was supported under internal research funds (PS).
Risk perception definition free#
This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. Received: Accepted: JanuPublished: March 1, 2018 PLoS ONE 13(3):Įditor: Gozde Ozakinci, University of Saint Andrews, UNITED KINGDOM These findings support the TRIRISK model and offer new insights into when risk perceptions predict protection motivation.Ĭitation: Ferrer RA, Klein WMP, Avishai A, Jones K, Villegas M, Sheeran P (2018) When does risk perception predict protection motivation for health threats? A person-by-situation analysis. For instance, affective risk perception better predicted protection motivation when deliberative risk perception was high, when the threat was less severe, and among participants who engage less in emotional reappraisal. Multi-level modeling of 2968 observations (32 health threats across 94 participants) showed interactions among the TRIRISK components and moderation both by person-level and situational factors. We leveraged a highly intensive within-subjects paradigm to test features of the health threat (i.e., perceived severity) and individual differences (e.g., emotion reappraisal) as moderators of the relationship between the three types of risk perception and protection motivation in a within-subjects design. The present study tackled this question by (a) adopting a multidimensional model of risk perception that comprises deliberative, affective, and experiential components (the TRIRISK model), and (b) taking a person-by-situation approach. Although risk perception is a key concept in many health behavior theories, little research has explicitly tested when risk perception predicts motivation to take protective action against a health threat (protection motivation).
0 kommentar(er)
